Lucid Motors

Steering Wheel Interactions

My Role: Product Design Manager (IC Designer)

 

Work With: UX Researchers, Interior Designer, Design Leadership, Hardware Engineers, Software Architects, Software Engineers (Backend/Frontend), Systems Engineers

In many new vehicles, the displays are bigger and flashier than ever, resulting in the disappearance of physical controls. Our experience shows there is a better way.

As we began to define the user experience for Gravity, we wanted to center user needs without overlooking chances to generate confidence and delight.

We learned a lot from the display layout and interfaces in Air, which let us seize the opportunity to elegantly blend the new possibilities of larger touchscreens with the simple, intuitive tactile controls that are scalable for future vehicle models.

Illustration of shells
Illustration of shells

UX Considerations for Interior Design: Learnings → Opportunities

Lessons from Air informed Gravity’s design evolution. The display layout was reworked to improve road visibility, user experience, ergonomics, and minimize distraction, while the steering wheel and its controls were refined to complement the 34-inch seamless display with intuitive, tactile interactions—providing flexibility today and a scalable foundation for future vehicles.

Steering Wheel Interactions: Challenge | Goal

Challenge: With expansive touch displays already delivering a rich set of features, the challenge was to design steering wheel interactions that meaningfully complement the system without introducing distraction.

Goal: Create controls that let drivers perform core tasks with simple, instinctive gestures while keeping their hands on the wheel and focus on the road—centering user needs while building confidence and delight.

Design Principles

Effortlessness

Drivers can complete most frequent tasks quickly and effortlessly without removing their hands from the steering wheel

Familiarity

Drivers use interactions, gestures, and behaviors they are already familiar with in their daily lives

Contextual Mapping

Controls are located close to corresponding content areas, making it easy to associate actions with outcomes

Intention

Drivers can interact with purpose with fewer false positives and unintentional actions

graphical representation

From Ambiguity to Clarity - A Collaborative Iterative Process

2021.12

Remove Stalks?

We conducted a study to explore removing the stalks for cost savings and a more minimalist design.

We found that drivers struggled with wheel-mounted turn signals in high-maneuver situations and preferred stationary PRND controls.

These insights revealed safety and usability risks, leading leadership to retain the stalks.

2022.02

Steering in the Right Direction

We then looked beyond traditional automotive trends, to modern product design, and learned from other’s mistakes

graphical representation
graphical representation
graphical representation

2022.03

Phygital Prototype

graphical representation

Physical + Digital

The user-centered design process works even with limited resources. We fabricated a prototype with a 3D printed steering wheel and attached it to an off-the-shelf digital display.

This was a key step to getting user feedback for our new steering wheel design.

2022.05

Initial Design Concept

Browsing Concept - Scroll Page on Wheel, Select on Screen

To elevate the already optimized touchscreen experience of our interface, Browsing Concept aimed to provide convenience and enhance quick-skimming while keeping hands on the wheel

graphical representation

2022.09

Interaction Model Studies

While Browsing Mode allowed users to quickly scroll through a large amount of information, we found that users wanted the ability to complete the task they started on the steering wheel, rather than with the touchscreen.

2022.11

Alternate Design Concept

Selection Concept - Navigate Step-by-Step on Wheel, Select on Wheel

Taking user feedback into consideration, we investigated a new, more granular interaction with a selectable state via the steering wheel.

graphical representation

2023.01

Road To Success

Through mixed-methods studies pitting the two interaction models against each other, we learned:

Familiarity

Users liked ‘Selection Concept’ as it matches similar systems in their lives such as TV remotes.

Distraction

  • Both interaction models were more distracting compared to just using the touchscreen.
  • Navigating step-by-step was more distracting in complex, layered browsing experiences.

Broken Experience

Having to go back and forth between screen and steering wheel for the same task was counter-intuitive.

Main Takeaway: We could introduce gesture controls with simple interactions for core tasks only.

graphical representation

Production Design Solution

The intuitive capacitive steering wheel controls let drivers access rich features easily with the confidence that comes from hands-on driving. On the left, swipes dismiss notifications or navigate vehicle info widgets, while presses activate and manage ADAS functions. On the right, swipes scroll through apps, and presses trigger the voice assistant or a customizable shortcut. The result is an experience so seamless and natural it feels instinctive—allowing drivers to stay focused on driving.

App switching

Swipe up or down to quickly move between apps

graphical representation

App-specific shortcuts

Swipe right within an app for shortcuts to most frequent interactions

graphical representation

Vehicle widget switching

Swipe to switch widgets and view key vehicle information

graphical representation

Notification dismissing

Swipe to dismiss notifications without taking hands off the steering wheel

graphical representation

One-press personalization

Set up a button for controlling a preferred feature with one press

graphical representation
Image of a biome-like texture

Lucid Motors

The Medium of Truth: Coral and the Collective Consciousness

Previous

Lucid Motors

DreamDrive (ADAS)

Next

Lucid Motors

Steering Wheel Interactions

My Role: Product Design Manager (IC Designer)

 

Work With: UX Researchers, Interior Designer, Design Leadership, Hardware Engineers, Software Architects, Software Engineers (Backend/Frontend), Systems Engineers

In many new vehicles, the displays are bigger and flashier than ever, resulting in the disappearance of physical controls. Our experience shows there is a better way.

As we began to define the user experience for Gravity, we wanted to center user needs without overlooking chances to generate confidence and delight.

We learned a lot from the display layout and interfaces in Air, which let us seize the opportunity to elegantly blend the new possibilities of larger touchscreens with the simple, intuitive tactile controls that are scalable for future vehicle models.

Illustration of shells
Illustration of shells

UX Considerations for Interior Design: Learnings → Opportunities

Lessons from Air informed Gravity’s design evolution. The display layout was reworked to improve road visibility, user experience, ergonomics, and minimize distraction, while the steering wheel and its controls were refined to complement the 34-inch seamless display with intuitive, tactile interactions—providing flexibility today and a scalable foundation for future vehicles.

Steering Wheel Interactions: Challenge | Goal

Challenge: With expansive touch displays already delivering a rich set of features, the challenge was to design steering wheel interactions that meaningfully complement the system without introducing distraction.

Goal: Create controls that let drivers perform core tasks with simple, instinctive gestures while keeping their hands on the wheel and focus on the road—centering user needs while building confidence and delight.

Design Principles

Effortlessness

Drivers can complete most frequent tasks quickly and effortlessly without removing their hands from the steering wheel

Familiarity

Drivers use interactions, gestures, and behaviors they are already familiar with in their daily lives

Contextual Mapping

Controls are located close to corresponding content areas, making it easy to associate actions with outcomes

Intention

Drivers can interact with purpose with fewer false positives and unintentional actions

graphical representation

From Ambiguity to Clarity - A Collaborative Iterative Process

2021.12

Remove Stalks?

We conducted a study to explore removing the stalks for cost savings and a more minimalist design.

We found that drivers struggled with wheel-mounted turn signals in high-maneuver situations and preferred stationary PRND controls.

These insights revealed safety and usability risks, leading leadership to retain the stalks.

2022.02

Steering in the Right Direction

We then looked beyond traditional automotive trends, to modern product design, and learned from other’s mistakes

graphical representation
graphical representation
graphical representation

2022.03

Phygital Prototype

graphical representation

Physical + Digital

The user-centered design process works even with limited resources. We fabricated a prototype with a 3D printed steering wheel and attached it to an off-the-shelf digital display.

This was a key step to getting user feedback for our new steering wheel design.

2022.05

Initial Design Concept

Browsing Concept - Scroll Page on Wheel, Select on Screen

To elevate the already optimized touchscreen experience of our interface, Browsing Concept aimed to provide convenience and enhance quick-skimming while keeping hands on the wheel

graphical representation

2022.09

Interaction Model Studies

While Browsing Mode allowed users to quickly scroll through a large amount of information, we found that users wanted the ability to complete the task they started on the steering wheel, rather than with the touchscreen.

2022.11

Alternate Design Concept

Selection Concept - Navigate Step-by-Step on Wheel, Select on Wheel

Taking user feedback into consideration, we investigated a new, more granular interaction with a selectable state via the steering wheel.

graphical representation

2023.01

Road To Success

Through mixed-methods studies pitting the two interaction models against each other, we learned:

Familiarity

Users liked ‘Selection Concept’ as it matches similar systems in their lives such as TV remotes.

Distraction

  • Both interaction models were more distracting compared to just using the touchscreen.
  • Navigating step-by-step was more distracting in complex, layered browsing experiences.

Broken Experience

Having to go back and forth between screen and steering wheel for the same task was counter-intuitive.

Main Takeaway: We could introduce gesture controls with simple interactions for core tasks only.

graphical representation

Production Design Solution

The intuitive capacitive steering wheel controls let drivers access rich features easily with the confidence that comes from hands-on driving. On the left, swipes dismiss notifications or navigate vehicle info widgets, while presses activate and manage ADAS functions. On the right, swipes scroll through apps, and presses trigger the voice assistant or a customizable shortcut. The result is an experience so seamless and natural it feels instinctive—allowing drivers to stay focused on driving.

App switching

Swipe up or down to quickly move between apps

graphical representation

App-specific shortcuts

Swipe right within an app for shortcuts to most frequent interactions

graphical representation

Vehicle widget switching

Swipe to switch widgets and view key vehicle information

graphical representation

Notification dismissing

Swipe to dismiss notifications without taking hands off the steering wheel

graphical representation

One-press personalization

Set up a button for controlling a preferred feature with one press

graphical representation
Image of a biome-like texture

Lucid Motors

The Medium of Truth: Coral and the Collective Consciousness

Previous

Lucid Motors

DreamDrive (ADAS)

Next

Lucid Motors

Steering Wheel Interactions

My Role: Product Design Manager (IC Designer)

 

Work With: UX Researchers, Interior Designer, Design Leadership, Hardware Engineers, Software Architects, Software Engineers (Backend/Frontend), Systems Engineers

In many new vehicles, the displays are bigger and flashier than ever, resulting in the disappearance of physical controls. At Lucid, we thrive to show there is a better way - to elegantly blend the possibilities of larger touchscreens with the simple, intuitive tactile controls.

Illustration of shells
Illustration of shells

UX Considerations for Interior Design: Learnings → Opportunities

Lessons from Air informed Gravity’s design evolution. The display layout was reworked to improve road visibility, user experience, ergonomics, and minimize distraction, while the steering wheel and its controls were refined to complement the 34-inch seamless display with intuitive, tactile interactions—providing flexibility today and a scalable foundation for future vehicles.

Steering Wheel Interactions: Challenge | Goal

Challenge: With expansive touch displays already delivering a rich set of features, the challenge was to design steering wheel interactions that meaningfully complement the system without introducing distraction.

Goal: Create controls that let drivers perform core tasks with simple, instinctive gestures while keeping their hands on the wheel and focus on the road—centering user needs while building confidence and delight.

Design Principles

Effortlessness

Drivers can complete most frequent tasks quickly and effortlessly without removing their hands from the steering wheel

Familiarity

Drivers use interactions, gestures, and behaviors they are already familiar with in their daily lives

Contextual Mapping

Controls are located close to corresponding content areas, making it easy to associate actions with outcomes

Intention

Drivers can interact with purpose with fewer false positives and unintentional actions

graphical representation

From Ambiguity to Clarity - A Collaborative Iterative Process

2021.12

Remove Stalks?

We conducted a study to explore removing the stalks for cost savings and a more minimalist design.

We found that drivers struggled with wheel-mounted turn signals in high-maneuver situations and preferred stationary PRND controls.

These insights revealed safety and usability risks, leading leadership to retain the stalks.

2022.02

Steering in the Right Direction

We then looked beyond traditional automotive trends, to modern product design, and learned from other’s mistakes

graphical representation
graphical representation
graphical representation

2022.03

Phygital Prototype

graphical representation

Physical + Digital

The user-centered design process works even with limited resources. We fabricated a prototype with a 3D printed steering wheel and attached it to an off-the-shelf digital display.

This was a key step to getting user feedback for our new steering wheel design.

2022.05

Initial Design Concept

Browsing Concept - Scroll Page on Wheel, Select on Screen

To elevate the already optimized touchscreen experience of our interface, Browsing Concept aimed to provide convenience and enhance quick-skimming while keeping hands on the wheel

graphical representation

2022.09

Interaction Model Studies

While Browsing Mode allowed users to quickly scroll through a large amount of information, we found that users wanted the ability to complete the task they started on the steering wheel, rather than with the touchscreen.

2022.11

Alternate Design Concept

Selection Concept - Navigate Step-by-Step on Wheel, Select on Wheel

Taking user feedback into consideration, we investigated a new, more granular interaction with a selectable state via the steering wheel.

graphical representation

2023.01

Road To Success

Through mixed-methods studies pitting the two interaction models against each other, we learned:

Familiarity

Users liked ‘Selection Concept’ as it matches similar systems in their lives such as TV remotes.

Distraction

  • Both interaction models were more distracting compared to just using the touchscreen.
  • Navigating step-by-step was more distracting in complex, layered browsing experiences.

Broken Experience

Having to go back and forth between screen and steering wheel for the same task was counter-intuitive.

Main Takeaway: We could introduce gesture controls with simple interactions for core tasks only.

graphical representation

Production Design Solution

The intuitive capacitive steering wheel controls let drivers access rich features easily with the confidence that comes from hands-on driving. On the left, swipes dismiss notifications or navigate vehicle info widgets, while presses activate and manage ADAS functions. On the right, swipes scroll through apps, and presses trigger the voice assistant or a customizable shortcut. The result is an experience so seamless and natural it feels instinctive—allowing drivers to stay focused on driving.

App switching

Swipe up or down to quickly move between apps

graphical representation

App-specific shortcuts

Swipe right within an app for shortcuts to most frequent interactions

graphical representation

Vehicle widget switching

Swipe to switch widgets and view key vehicle information

graphical representation

Notification dismissing

Swipe to dismiss notifications without taking hands off the steering wheel

graphical representation

One-press personalization

Set up a button for controlling a preferred feature with one press

graphical representation
Image of a biome-like texture

Lucid Motors

Lucid In-Vehicle Experience (LIVE) - UX 3.0

Previous

Lucid Motors

DreamDrive (ADAS)

Next